for " professional ethics ", next Free Essays, good Essays, better Essays, stronger Essays. He goes on to can i begin an essay with a number recount a similar story involving Angela Beesley, previously a prominent member of the foundation which runs Wikipedia. A lot of the things he thinks he knows for sure aren't quite right, or are taken out of context. The user who visits Wikipedia to learn about some subject, to confirm some matter of fact, is rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom. "We Can't Ignore the Influence of Digital Technologies". 102 BBC technology specialist Bill Thompson wrote that "Most Wikipedia entries are written and submitted in good faith, and we should not let the contentious areas such as politics, religion or biography shape our view of the project as a whole that it forms. "The College Student Who 'Knew' About the Benoit Murder-Suicide Before Police". 197 In October 2012 the Asian Football Confederation official website published an article about the United Arab Emirates national football team 's bid to qualify for the 2015 AFC Asian Cup, in which the team's nickname was stated to be the "Sand Monkeys". Medical ethics began as a professional code for physicians and has now expanded and includes a variety of health care professions and health care organizations. 136, "Wikipedia Uncovered" " PC Authority 'Wikipedia Uncovered. "Police: Wiki Confession an 'Unbelievable Hindrance.
For instance, "50 percent of US physicians report that they've consulted. 168 Notable incidents See also: List of Wikipedia controversies False biographical information Cached version of a deleted biographical hoax in the French Wikipedia. Jaspers' formulation of Transcendence as ultimate non-objectivity (or no-thing-ness) has led many philosophers to argue that ultimately, Jaspers became a monist, though Jaspers himself continually stressed the necessity of recognizing the validity of the concepts both of subjectivity and of objectivity. "Internet encyclopaedias go head to head: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries". Wood, A; Struthers, K (2010). The article had survived for more than nine years before being deleted, making it one of the longest-lived documented hoax articles in Wikipedia's history.