3 of them reported spelling errors).". "Several colleges push to ban Wikipedia as resource". I will never post anything here again unless it is pure fact. "Collective Intelligence and Neutral Point of View: The Case of Wikipedia". "On Wikipedia, Debating 2008 Hopefuls' Every Facet". This information regarding Benoit's wife's death was added fourteen hours before police discovered the bodies of Benoit and his family. 147 The Washington Post commented, in the context of 2008 Presidential election candidate biographies, that despite occasional brief vandalism, "it's hard to find a more up-to-date, detailed, thorough article on Obama than Wikipedia's. Archived from the original on 13 September 2006. After our Jossi Fresco story, Fresco didn't refute our reporting. Group 2007, doi: ACM. It is an online encyclopaedia and information can be entered therein by any person and as such it may not be authentic." 104 In his 2007 Guide to Military History on the Internet, Simon Fowler rated Wikipedia as "the best general resource" for military history. Shane Fitzgerald (May 7, 2009).
In an article in the Times Higher Education magazine (London) philosopher Martin Cohen frames Wikipedia of having "become a monopoly" with "all the prejudices and ignorance of its creators which he describes as a "youthful cab-drivers" perspective. 142 In one notable case, the trademark of Formula One racing decision, 143 the UK Intellectual Property Office considered both the reliability of Wikipedia, and its usefulness as a reliable source of evidence: Wikipedia has sometimes suffered from the self-editing that is intrinsic. Third International Workshop on the Value of Security through Collaboration, securecomm. It found that "the collaborative and participatory design of Wikipedia does generate high quality information on pharmacology that is suitable for undergraduate medical education". Attempts to perpetrate hoaxes may not be confined to editing Wikipedia articles. Mirror duped by Wikipedia 'fact' ( Web User, ) "New-look Manchester City side begin their uefa Cup campaign in earnest".
1000 word essay on accountability in the army
"Wikipedia vs Encyclopaedia: A question of trust?". 123 In the game, two articles (preferably with similar names) are compared: one about an acknowledged serious or classical subject and the other about a popular topic or current event. "Trust your doctor, not Wikipedia, say scientists". But the vast majority of Wikipedia is filled with valuable and accurate information." 51 A 2008 paper in Reference Services Review compared nine Wikipedia entries on historical topics to their counterparts in Encyclopdia Britannica, The Dictionary of American History and American National Biography Online. «Wikipdia en butte une nouvelle affaire de calomnie» Archived May 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine., 28 novembre 2007. Archived from the original on Retrieved Morris, Kevin. "Wikipedia and the art of censorship". A 2014 study found no correlation chemistry homework help online between characteristics of a given Wikipedia page about an academic and the academic's notability as determined by citation counts. However, according to Stevie Benton of Wikimedia UK the sample size used in the research may have been too small to be considered representative. Anthony, Denise; Smith, Sean.; Williamson, Timothy. Archived from the original. Larry Press, Professor of Computer Information Systems, California State University.
1000 Word Essay On The Importance Of Accountability In The Army. Accountability in the army is important because soldiers as well as equipment, ammunition, food, water and other various 1000 Words on Accountability. Free Essays on Military Gear. Strugling in pain of writing 18 pagess essay.